
When a traveller starts dreaming about their next trip, the race to their inbox has already begun. If your team takes 24 to 48 hours to get your proposals out, some might say you have a speed problem. Push harder, work faster, find more hours in the day, or the traveller will commit elsewhere.
But slow turnaround is rarely caused by your working speed. It’s a sign of something else. And if you read that sign correctly, it’ll point you towards the structural fixes you can make in your business to resolve the issue.
When a proposal takes two days to leave your inbox, you may wonder whether your team is working hard enough. But the delay is almost never about effort. It’s normally because the process your team is following has friction built in at every stage.
The content isn’t where they can easily find it. Costings live in a separate spreadsheet. It isn’t clear what itinerary version they need to use. And the person who built the last itinerary isn’t available to explain how they structured it. Each of these challenges creates a pause in the process, and those pauses add up.
Treating this as a speed problem is like flooring the game viewer when you’re stuck in a dry riverbed. It’s the route you took that got you stuck, not the vehicle.
If your travel proposal turnaround is consistently slow, the cause almost always traces back to one or more of the four challenges listed below.
Every time a new proposal needs to go out, your team sources images from individual supplier websites, WhatsApp threads, shared drives, and email attachments. There’s no single up-to-date content library ready for them to use. Instead, each proposal starts with a scavenger hunt that quietly eats away at time like army ants clearing the undergrowth.
The itinerary gets written in one place, costed in another, formatted in a third, and sent from a fourth. Every handoff between tools is a pause, a space for potential error, and an opportunity for something to fall through the gap. A proposal workflow that moves across multiple platforms without automation represents both a time and monetary cost for your business. If you’d like to have a closer look at the numbers, read our post on why your travel proposal workflow feels harder than it should.
Your team is handling multiple versions of the same itinerary. With no single source of truth, nobody quite knows which version is current. Atlassian’s State of Teams report found that 50% of knowledge workers have worked on a project only to later discover a colleague was doing the same task. Reconciling versions is a manual activity that consumes time and creates anxiety about whether what’s being sent is right. That’s duplicated effort that costs time nobody budgeted for.
Each consultant builds proposals their own way. That means turnaround time and quality vary depending on who’s handling the enquiry that day. Handover and work-sharing is much harder than it needs to be, and there’s no common baseline to improve from.
In the 48 hours it takes your proposal to arrive, your client isn’t sitting at their desk scrolling Instagram as they wait for your email. They sent the same enquiry to several operators. And they’ve started forming impressions. The one who responded within hours already feels more reliable, more organised, more worth trusting with something as important as a trip of a lifetime. By the time yours lands, you may already be runner-up in a mental ranking you didn’t know existed.
In luxury travel especially, where so much business moves through referrals and repeat bookings, that first impression compounds. Clients who feel uncertain early rarely become strong advocates later. And in a market where one referred booking can be worth thousands, the quiet reputation you’re building (or eroding) with every slow proposal matters more than the individual offer on the table.
Turnaround time is the first signal your client receives about what working with you is going to be like.
Before you decide the best solution to all this is simply to knuckle down, try getting your team to give you honest answers to these questions:
Their answers to these questions will tell you far more about your workflow than any amount of cracking the whip ever will.
For most travel businesses, the path to consistently faster turnaround involves consolidation:
When supplier content is held in a centralised content library, your team builds itineraries once then adapts them rather than creating them from scratch each time, all on the same platform. Proposals go out faster because the friction has been removed, and your team keeps working at a steady pace, without burnout.
Grant Anderson-Saville of Visions of Africa describes exactly this shift. Before Wetu, their itineraries were long Word documents, and turnaround time was, in his own words, “incredibly slow.” A complex two-week itinerary now takes around 20 minutes. He reinvests the time saved in mentoring his team and building agent relationships.
Once your turnaround is no longer the tail wagging the wild dog, the next question is how to use that efficiency as a genuine competitive advantage. Our post on the tour operator sales strategy hiding in your proposal workflow shows what becomes possible when you’re friction free.
Start your free trial and see how a consolidated workflow and itinerary builder will change your travel proposal turnaround time.